WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch

WH Czech occupation-medal '1 October 1938' that comes stored in its 'L/52'-marked, 'Zellstoff'-based 'LDO'-type pouch

This is a very attractive - and in such untouched and complete condition fairly unusually seen! - example of a WH Czech occupation medal '1 October 1938' (as was awarded to all members of the armed forces that participated in the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, which started on 1 October 1938) that comes stored in its original, carton- (ie. 'Zellstoff'-) based 'LDO'-type pouch and that comes in an overall very nice- (albeit issued- but simply never worn-, used- nor even once-mounted-), condition. This example came together with its original (non-confectioned, folded and/or approximately 19 cms. long-sized) ribbon as found and issued. The medal is a very attractive example having great detail: all of its (minimally tarnished) golden-bronze finish is still perfectly preserved whereas the medal has a minimal 'blackened' tarnish ie. age-patina. The pouch - which is scarce in itself! - is unusual, having a (black-coloured) 'LDO'-designation printed on its front and also shows an (equally black-ink-toned (contents)stamp that shows the to be expected text: 'Die Herstellung von Orden….etc.' on its back. Of additional interest is, moreover the presence of a (small) green -ink-stamp that reads: 'L/52'. (as can be seen on the pictures). The pouch comes in an overall very nice - and of course fully functional - condition. The set was found as such and always belonged together. I deem that the sets' comparative scarcity justifies my asking-price!

Code: 67394

Reserved